Head on over to Leading From the Heart and leave Tracy Rosen a comment on her thought-provoking post about revisiting digital literacy. Here’s the comment I just left her:
I am by no means a ‘literacy’ expert. For me, the idea of literacy means something like ‘fluency in the dominant information landscape(s) of your time, both as a consumer and as a producer.’ In the past, that has meant being an adequate reader and an adequate writer. It is increasingly clear that the dominant information landscape of our present and future is one that is digital, networked, interactive, hyperconnected, dispersed, rapidly-changing, multimedia, and so on. This new information landscape requires additional fluencies beyond those needed for a paper-based world.
Fluency in paper-bound text and graphics is still a necessary skill today. The need to be a high-level reader and writer is going to be around for a long while. But the dominance of the written word slowly will be eroded by other forms of audio/video expression. For me, the exciting thing about many of these new ‘literacies’ is that students and educators now have unprecedented opportunities to create things of value to the larger world, to have a legitimate voice, and to reach authentic audiences.
Like any good progressive, Chris Lehmann advocates emphasis on facilitation of students as digital citizens rather than emphasis on preparing students to be digital workers. I too am very much in favor of empowering students personally and on the citizenship front. But I also want my kids to have a meaningful, rewarding career (that, hopefully, also contributes to society in some way). And that means getting what Richard Florida calls a ‘creative class’ job – one that requires autonomy, independent judgment, creativity, innovation, creative problem-solving, and, yes, fluency with digital technologies. Creative class jobs are facilitated and enhanced by digital technologies, not replaced by them (as often happens with service or working class jobs).
So I empathize with your concern, Tracy, about respecting others’ approaches to sense-making. And I too am concerned with the differential access that developing countries and underserved student populations have. But I think the task for all of us is to bring them into the digital, global 21st century, not to define ‘literacy’ in ways that continue to disempower them socially and/or economically for decades to come (note: I’m not saying you’re doing this).
Here’s an old post of mine on social justice that might be of interest:
Thanks for a thoughtful, thought-provoking post. I look forward to reading others’ comments!
Scott-
Thank you for taking the time to share this.
My experience recently shows me that emphasizing 'literacy' is a last resort of people who want to deny the centrality of technological literacy or 'fluency' in your word.
What you have written gives te lie to this dialectic as they inveigh against the video watching/Facebooking infidels at The Gate.
If I'm off the beam with this insight reading my own self into what isn't really there, I apologize.
Posted by: Skip Zalneraitis | July 26, 2008 at 02:37 PM
Students today are like students that have come before. They have to adapt to the changing world around them. This is the same for people everywhere. You are not going to get very far in the real world unless you adapt and change. Many individuals of all ages are struggling both economically and with their communication in this technology driven world.
Of course we need to learn how to read and write and have as a society a high literacy rate. This is not enough! Our children need to be prepared for life after school and digital literacy is critical to their education. We have not done a good job of this yet. Schools need to change and adapt as society changes. I am hopeful that this new generation of digital native teachers can infuse our educational system with real change. It is critical to our students literacy!
* Heidi Pence
http://hpence.blogspot.com
Posted by: Heidi Pence | July 26, 2008 at 03:34 PM
Skip and Heidi, thanks for your thoughtful comments. Go leave them at Tracy's blog too!
Posted by: Scott McLeod | July 26, 2008 at 04:01 PM
Not sure I understand your comment, Skip.
"emphasizing 'literacy' is a last resort of people who want to deny the centrality of technological literacy or 'fluency'"
Posted by: Tracy Rosen | July 26, 2008 at 07:55 PM