Dangerously Irrelevant
Ruminations on technology, leadership, and the future of our schools
Home
October 30, 2007
Lecturing v. conversation
Well said,
Indexed
.
Oct 30, 2007 11:15:16 PM
|
Miscellaneous
,
Tech Integration
NEXT POST
Kim Moritz is down for the count
Send Kim some smelling salts (i.e., comments) to try and revive her. We need her back. 1 year ago: Gaming, cognition, and education - Wrap-up
PREVIOUS POST
Through the Keyhole
Some of you may be interested in Through the Keyhole, my 'random thoughts' blog where I put stuff not directly related to K-12 technology and/or leadership issues. Recent posts have covered everything from effective lectures to White House censorship to elite college admissions to bottled water to boiling your family....
Scott McLeod
1,199
Following
146
Followers
Search
My Other Accounts
Delicious
|
scottmcleod
Digg
|
scottmcleod
Facebook
|
scottmcleod
Flickr
|
mcleod
LinkedIn
|
scottmcleod
Skype
|
dr.scott.mcleod
Technorati
|
mcleod
Twitter
|
mcleod
Vimeo
|
mcleod
YouTube
|
drscottmcleod
Recent Comments
Trish:
Not so much a worry here about content filterin...
|
more »
On
Your technology coordinator works for you, not the other way around
Julie:
Though I often feel my school is way behind the...
|
more »
On
Does your school organization reflect our new digital information landscape?
Anthony Manzo, Ph.D.:
Scott, Are you the least concerned about the m...
|
more »
On
About me and this blog
I really get tired of the mis-perception of television as this passive anti-learning medium. While it is certainly true that there is crap being broadcast, it is absolutely false that quality programming isn't available. Throw in TiVo age of on-demand content and a penchant for "active viewing" that includes making use of the fast-forward button to skip the commercials, and the quality rises significantly.
Like any technology, use is going to dictate effectiveness. If one only manages to figure out the on/off button and camps out on a sofa for hours of undiscerning viewing, the simplistic description of the ills of television come true. If, on the other hand, viewing is done as a social practice (families or co-workers), then it becomes not only an important cultural marker that bonds generations together, but also a key catalyst for discussion ... which ultimately is the greatest form of learning.
I get the point of the graphic, but it is very telling that three of the activities with some redeeming value are all actions and the one that is easy to condemn is a device. As some furry monster might say on Sesame Street: One of these things is not like the other.
Posted by: Kevin Makice | October 31, 2007 at 12:28 AM
Absolutely. I'm starring this one, sharing it, AND adding it to my del.icio.us list.
Posted by: Rick | October 31, 2007 at 01:40 AM
Where's Neil Postman when you need him?
Posted by: ken | October 31, 2007 at 08:05 AM
I'd like to piggyback off of Kevin's comment.
First, isn't listening part of watching television?
Second, television can be an active learning experience. I have conversations with my two year daughter when she watches TV. Many times she points to things and says, "What's that?" I'll answer and sometimes follow up with my own question like, "What color is that?" I credit our conversations around television for many of the words in Morgan's ever increasing vocabulary.
Posted by: David Robb | October 31, 2007 at 06:00 PM
Well found.
As to TV, I love watching the Discovery and National Geographic channels with my kids. I think that there is a lot to be learned there, especially since we discuss the programs while we watch them. Also, as we live in Japan, TV is nearly the only other source of English for my kids besides me...
Posted by: Steve Henneberry | November 02, 2007 at 07:33 AM